Neil deGrasse Tyson Declares A.I. Not a Threat to Comedy Jobs

UPDATE: Renowned astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson just announced that comedians can breathe easy—artificial intelligence is not poised to take over their jobs anytime soon. Speaking in New York City earlier today, Tyson provided reassurance to worried comics, asserting that A.I. lacks the essential human touch needed to craft impactful jokes.

Tyson emphasized that A.I. remains fundamentally “soulless,” highlighting a critical barrier for any machine attempting to deliver humor. “I’ve asked A.I. to give me some good jokes … they were on a bad dad-joke level,” he stated, underscoring the limitations of current technology in understanding the nuances of comedy.

This revelation comes amid a growing panic among creatives regarding A.I.’s capabilities. Tyson pointed out a significant inconsistency: while automation has historically wiped out jobs in sectors like manufacturing, the artistic community has remained largely silent. “The creative artists didn’t think about it or care, because they weren’t on the assembly line. So where was their sympathy when other people were losing their jobs?” he questioned.

In a light-hearted twist, Tyson also speculated on the potential for A.I. to disrupt other fields, such as therapy. He joked about the need for a new branch of therapy to help those falling in love with their A.I. chatbots.

Tyson’s remarks highlight an important dialogue about the future of work in creative industries. As A.I. technology evolves, the question remains: what will be the role of human creativity?

For those eager to dive deeper into Tyson’s perspectives, his latest book, “Just Visiting This Planet,” is now available, offering insights not just about the universe but also about the human experience in the face of rapid technological change.

As this story develops, it raises critical questions for both creatives and industry professionals about the interplay between technology and the arts. Share your thoughts on A.I. and its impact on creativity—are we truly safe, or is it just a matter of time?