Los Angeles County CEO Receives $2 Million Payout While Keeping Job

A recent revelation has brought attention to a controversial $2 million payout given to Fesia Davenport, the chief executive officer of Los Angeles County, while she continues in her role. The payment, which is intended to cover damages related to alleged harm to her reputation, embarrassment, and emotional distress, has raised eyebrows, particularly as it does not stem from a termination but rather from a conflict surrounding the passage of Measure G.

According to reports from LAist, the Board of Supervisors approved this settlement in a closed session on July 29, 2023, and finalized it about two weeks later. The agreement was kept confidential until it came to light that the county had allocated millions in taxpayer dollars to this payout. Davenport currently earns an annual salary of $862,000 and remains in her position as CEO despite the financial compensation.

The crux of the issue lies in Measure G, a voter-approved initiative that restructures county government. This measure, which was placed on the ballot by the Board of Supervisors and approved by voters in 2024, changes the CEO’s position from an appointed office to one that will be elected by the county’s residents. Although the measure will not take effect until the 2028 election, Davenport has expressed her discontent regarding its implications for her career.

In a letter addressed to county counsel, Davenport articulated her concerns, stating, “Measure G is an unprecedented event, and has had, and will continue to have, an unprecedented impact on my professional reputation, health, career, income, and retirement.” This statement underscores her view of the measure as detrimental to her future prospects.

The settlement has sparked outrage among taxpayers, many of whom view it as an egregious misuse of public funds. Critics argue that such financial decisions further illustrate a pattern of waste and mismanagement within California’s governance. From reported instances of $50 billion in unemployment fraud to ongoing costs associated with infrastructure projects, there is a growing sentiment that political leaders are failing in their duty to act as responsible stewards of taxpayer money.

The effort to keep the settlement confidential adds another layer of concern regarding transparency and accountability in government. The decision to approve the payout without public disclosure illustrates a growing disconnect between public officials and the citizens they serve. As taxpayers grapple with the implications of such agreements, the call for more oversight and responsible governance remains urgent.

As the debate over accountability in public office continues, the situation surrounding Fesia Davenport serves as a stark reminder of the challenges facing California’s political landscape. With the upcoming implementation of Measure G, the future of the CEO position and the management of public funds will be under intense scrutiny. The outcome of these developments could reshape the governance of Los Angeles County for years to come.