Marjorie Taylor Greene Claims Shutdown Ends ‘Weather Modification’

UPDATE: In an unexpected twist, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene announced that the ongoing government shutdown has halted what she describes as “taxpayer-funded weather modification experiments.” Greene, a Republican from Georgia, took to X on Friday to declare, “One good thing to come from this government shutdown… CLEAR SKIES!”

Greene’s comments come as U.S. government agencies firmly refute her claims, stating they are not involved in large-scale weather modification. Greene’s assertion raises immediate questions about the validity of her statements and the potential implications for public policy.

Authorities have been quick to respond. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) clarified, “The U.S. government is not engaged in any form of outdoor testing… or large-scale deployment” of weather modification technologies. Furthermore, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) confirmed that it does not fund or participate in cloud seeding or any other weather modification projects.

Greene’s remarks are particularly striking in light of ongoing conspiracy theories surrounding weather modification, which have gained traction in recent years. These theories often suggest that such projects contribute to natural disasters, although experts highlight a lack of evidence supporting these claims. In her statement, Greene emphasized her commitment to ending what she calls “dangerous and unregulated practices,” referencing her proposed Clear Skies Act aimed at banning geoengineering.

Despite Greene’s claims, commercial flights continue to operate during the government shutdown, further undermining her assertions. Cloud seeding, a practice used since the mid-1900s, is primarily funded at the state level and currently active in at least nine Western states, aimed at enhancing snowpack and mitigating drought impacts.

The implications of Greene’s claims extend beyond her rhetoric. Reports indicate that the Trump administration is preparing a Department of Health and Human Services task force to investigate climate and weather control, raising concerns among climate scientists. “That is a pretty shocking memo,” said climate scientist Daniel Swain from the University of California, referring to a memo that outlines various unfounded conspiracy theories.

As the government shutdown continues, the dialogue surrounding weather modification remains contentious. Greene’s position reflects a growing divide in public perception over government involvement in environmental interventions. As she pushes for legislative action, the question looms: what will be the real impact of these claims on future policy?

Stay tuned for further developments as this story unfolds, and the implications of Greene’s statements continue to resonate across the political landscape.