New York AG Accuses Trump Prosecutor of Hiding Key Evidence

BREAKING: New York Attorney General Letitia James has accused President Donald Trump‘s controversial prosecutor, Lindsey Halligan, of concealing critical evidence in an ongoing fraud case. This urgent development was reported just moments ago, as James’ legal team demands transparency from federal prosecutors.

In a filing submitted on September 25, 2023, James’ lawyers stated that over 100 pages of essential documents appear to be missing from the evidence provided to them. The case centers around allegations that James misrepresented properties as primary residences on mortgage applications—a claim many experts argue lacks substantial proof.

According to sources at Talking Points Memo, the missing documents were reportedly handed over to prosecutors by former FHFA (Federal Housing Finance Agency) acting Inspector General Joe Allen. James’ attorneys claim the discovery process has revealed significant gaps, raising questions about the integrity of the evidence being presented in court.

The stakes are high as Halligan, who was appointed after her predecessor declined to pursue charges against Trump’s critics, faces criticism of her own. Legal analysts have pointed out that evidence contradicts the accusations against James, and even an internal memo from prosecutors casts doubt on the legitimacy of the case.

In a dramatic twist, James’ team highlighted that Allen and several other ethics officials were dismissed shortly after they began investigating whether Bill Pulte—the individual leveling accusations against James—improperly accessed mortgage data related to Trump’s political opponents. The administration claimed these firings were due to a push for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies that contradicted Trump’s agenda.

Halligan is no stranger to controversy; she has previously filed charges against former FBI Director James Comey and is currently facing scrutiny regarding her appointment as U.S. attorney. Critics argue she lacks the authorization to pursue such prosecutions.

This developing story is set to impact the broader legal landscape as the tension between Trump’s administration and state officials escalates. Legal observers are urged to monitor the situation closely as further evidence may emerge in the coming days.

As this urgent situation unfolds, the implications for James, Halligan, and the Trump administration could reshape public perception and legal precedent. Stay tuned for updates as we continue to follow this evolving narrative.